Contact Us for help
Follow on Facebook Follow on X Follow on LinkedIn Follow on Spotify Follow on iTunes
Join the Planning Geek Facebook Group
Jump to content

Lisa

Free Members
  • Posts

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Lisa's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. Sorry for the long post , maybe someone has been through similar . I applied for a certificate of lawfullness for a converted shipping container iny garden ,it has a sofa bed , office desk , windows door , and was going to have A toilet and shower . I put a thorough lawfullness certificate application together, quoting as much case law as I could find LPA agreed it was not a change of use . The max height of the roof on the pent is ,2.6 (over the PD) threshold. My understanding is the general consensus that it was a caravan , in the legal sense , However the application has been refused due to the addition of a bolt on steel sheet pent roof making it a structure . When they visited I pointed out roof can be unbolted and doesn't stop it being transported . ......local planning authority, hereby REFUSE to certify that on 21st December 2023 the use/operations/matters described in the First Schedule to this certificate in respect of the land specified in the Second Schedule to this certificate and identified on the plan attached to this certificate, were lawful within the meaning of section 191 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for the following reason: The evidence available suggests to the Local Planning Authority that the structure currently sited in the rear residential garden of ##### for additional residential accommodation does not amount to a material change of use of the land. Officers consider the addition of the roofing structure means that the structure as a whole amounts to operational development. The operational development does not comply with the criteria set out in Schedule 2, Part 1 Class E of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015. The development was therefore not lawful at the time of the application being made. Should I remove the roof? And try again ? Or should I appeal , I have quickly drafted (notmsent) an appeal but would like some advice .. 1) caravan law states no more than 2 pieces. The caravan has a roof and the unit itself, so is no more than 2 pieces and when separated or when whole it can be transported by road even if it would not be legal to do so. The container caravan can be craned as one piece using straps underneath. The roof is held on with 4 bolts and has it over hangs by a meter it would be easier to separate the roof and transport in 2 pieces but It is possible to crane and transport on lorry as a whole piece. Example case law 2 sections Odina v Mackland Ltd County Court (Central London) 27 May 2009 2) I believe Additional fixings does not mean it is no longer a caravan and added roof does not make it a structure Example case law Hand v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2014] EWHC 314 (Admin). I'm trying to make this as painless as possible and avoid this dragging on for years. Any advice would be welcome.
×
  • Create New...